ABUSIVE SUPERVISION, WORK STRESS AND OVERLOAD AS PREDICTORS OF COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIOUR ON EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY

Franklin Ejiofor Eke, Remigius Okonwko Ikpe

Abstract


This study examines the impact of abusive supervision, work stress, and work overload on employee outcomes, including counterproductive work behavior, employee engagement, and productivity. The research, conducted through a secondary research approach that synthesizes existing literature, explores the complex interplay between these variables and proposes preventive measures to mitigate their adverse effects. The findings reveal that abusive supervision, characterized by hostile behaviors from supervisors towards subordinates, significantly diminishes job satisfaction, increases turnover intentions, and reduces organizational commitment. Work stress, stemming from high job demands and a lack of control, leads to burnout, decreased job satisfaction, and impaired performance. Workload overload, characterized by excessive responsibilities, negatively affects job satisfaction and engagement. The study also highlights the synergistic effects of these stressors, with their combined impact more significant than the sum of their individual effects. The research emphasizes the need for organizations to prioritize employee well-being and implement proactive strategies, such as training programs, support systems, and performance management, to mitigate the adverse effects of these stressors. Future research should focus on cross-cultural comparisons, longitudinal designs, and individual differences to enhance our understanding and develop culturally sensitive interventions. This study underscores the importance of addressing abusive supervision, work stress, and work overload to foster healthier, more productive work environments.


Keywords


work overload, abusive supervision, work stress, counterproductive, productivity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Cropanzano, R., & Grandey, A. A. (1999). The conservation of resources model applied to work-family conflict and strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(2), 350-370. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1666

Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2017). The role of safety leadership and working conditions in safety performance in process industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 50, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.11.001

Harms, P. D., Roberts, B. W., & Winter, D. (2017). Becoming rich and famous: The role of self-enhancement in the pursuit of fame. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1271-1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617701723

Kendra Cherry, Mse. (2024, June 24). What is a cross-sectional study?.Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-a-cross-sectional-study-2794978

Kemper, Samantha, (2016). Abusive Supervision in the Workplace: An Examination of Current Research and a Proposal for Preventive Measures". University Honors Theses. Paper 303. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.248

Khan, Ali & Moin, Muhammad & Zhu, Qianlin&Lahlouh, Khaled. (2023). Abusive supervision and service employee’s wellbeing. Current Psychology. 43. 10.1007/s12144-023-05265-x.

Myers, D. G., DeWall, C. N. (2016). Psychology in Everyday Life. United States: Worth Publishers.

Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 31(2), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463

Oliveira, Lucia &Najnudel, Priscila. (2023). The influence of abusive supervision on employee engagement, stress and turnover intention. Revista de Gestão. 30. 78-91. 10.1108/REGE-02-2021-0025

Putri Shaliha, R., Rahayuningsih, T., & Purna, R. S. (2023). The effect of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) on counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in sales employees. Psikologia: JurnalPemikiran Dan PenelitianPsikologi, 18(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.32734/psikologia.v18i2.12768

Sambung, R. (2019). Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance; Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior as Mediations. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20190703.12

Smith, G. D., Aveyard, H., Jane, N., & Penny, K. I. (2023). Improving the conduct and reporting of meta-analyses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(9), 3186-3188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15562

Yang, L. Q., Che, H. S., & Spector, P. E. (2014). Job stress and well-being: An examination from the view of person–environment fit. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12051


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Franklin Ejiofor Eke, Remigius Okonwko Ikpe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ISSN (PRINT):    2682 - 6135

ISSN (ONLINE): 2682 - 6127

 

 

   

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.